If you have many friends in the “end time discernment” group then your social media will be especially buzzing right now with the current attacks of Israel against Iran, cue the “Israel is just defending itself” rhetoric.
I totally agree. I have many connections in China and they are all about business. Their language and culture is unprecedented. I hope the kings of the east continue to establish independence from the Babylonian noose of the west. Iran is a beautiful country from what I can see. China is 100%. I also hope the USA states and Europe also free themselves from the Babylonian noose as well.
We in the west and those in the east must be dig into facts and not be bamboozled into more immoral wars based on lies and propaganda.
While Rev. Littefield rightly points out the economic motivations behind Western hostility toward Iran and the media’s omission of projects like the China-Iran railway corridor, I must respectfully disagree with his conclusion that BRICS+ represents a true alternative to globalist power. Based on my years working within elite consumer advisory networks and studying Agenda 21/2030 implementation firsthand, I can confirm that BRICS is not an organic counterweight to the Western order, it’s a carefully constructed dialectical tool serving the same globalist vision.
The infrastructure now being celebrated—Belt and Road, the BRICS Bank, digital trade corridors—is not a break from the globalist agenda but a core extension of it. China’s so-called “Silk Road” isn’t resisting globalism; it’s establishing a regional headquarters for it. This is stakeholder capitalism—more accurately, stakeholder Sovietism—dressed in multipolar garb: technocratic, surveilled, and centrally managed.
We’re not witnessing the fall of the old world order. We’re witnessing its rebranding.
Yes, Western media lies. But BRICS+ is not the alternative it's marketed to be. It is a globalist-engineered bloc—and in many ways, it’s further along in adapting to the architecture of the coming technocratic system than the West. I spent nearly 13 years living in Asia and saw this convergence firsthand.
Thank you for all you do, Rev Littlefield!
Grace and peace.
—Summer Black
Christian researcher, former senior strategist in syndicated media and global trend forecasting
You may have a point about Brics. I don't see them as good guys. I think they are hard to find among the world leaders at the moment. I hope all globalist efforts fail.
I have a similar take on this topic. I also look at the socio-political issues underpinning Brazil and South Africa which are leaning strongly toward unchecked socialism in the case of the former and rabid ethno-socialism in the latter. Part of the problem in the case of Brazil is that there are long-standing political tensions between them and Argentina which are likely going to become worse with Argentina actually starting to do well for itself under policies which Americans would recognize as closer to classic conservative. As for South Africa, I think they are heading in the same direction of every other third world socialist nation but with the added problem that many other countries in Africa are experiencing - de facto enslavement and deteriorating living conditions at the hands of the Chinese. If it weren't for all the other horrible stuff that China will do in the rest of the world with their increased access to increasingly in-demand rare earth minerals, I'd say we should let Africa fend for itself. Unfortunately, BRICS will become a mechanism of subjugation and manipulation and simple subversion of even the good parts of international law, to wit: China using its coast guard and military to protect its illegal fishing fleets as they poach in protected fisheries in Ecuadorian waters. Eventually, given enough strength, China will either have to come to some kind of fascistic detente with the Muslim world or go to war with it as they have with with Uyghurs.
Even if Israel and the US explicitly stated that they were striking at Iran because of this railway, I wouldn't have a problem with what Israel is doing because, as with everything else, China will use it to circumvent national borders and laws, move ever-increasing amounts of Fentanyl and other contraband, arms trafficking, personnel and materiel for embedded black and gray ops similar to what they have embedded (https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4008817-crack-down-on-illegal-chinese-police-stations-in-the-u-s/) in major cities in the United States. Similarly, it would be a means of moving vast quantities of heroin from Afghanistan and providing arms and technical support to basically every bad actor in the Eastern Hemisphere. Although, unlike in the Koran, there's no explicit endorsement of deception in interpersonal and international dealings, the CCP absolutely cannot be trusted to do anything other than whatever they can so long as it advances their national interests and regardless of international law or the laws of other nations. The only thing this railroad will do is create a link between two sets of powers that are every bit as evil as the Third Reich or the USSR: the Islamic world and the CCP.
I totally agree. I have many connections in China and they are all about business. Their language and culture is unprecedented. I hope the kings of the east continue to establish independence from the Babylonian noose of the west. Iran is a beautiful country from what I can see. China is 100%. I also hope the USA states and Europe also free themselves from the Babylonian noose as well.
We in the west and those in the east must be dig into facts and not be bamboozled into more immoral wars based on lies and propaganda.
While Rev. Littefield rightly points out the economic motivations behind Western hostility toward Iran and the media’s omission of projects like the China-Iran railway corridor, I must respectfully disagree with his conclusion that BRICS+ represents a true alternative to globalist power. Based on my years working within elite consumer advisory networks and studying Agenda 21/2030 implementation firsthand, I can confirm that BRICS is not an organic counterweight to the Western order, it’s a carefully constructed dialectical tool serving the same globalist vision.
The infrastructure now being celebrated—Belt and Road, the BRICS Bank, digital trade corridors—is not a break from the globalist agenda but a core extension of it. China’s so-called “Silk Road” isn’t resisting globalism; it’s establishing a regional headquarters for it. This is stakeholder capitalism—more accurately, stakeholder Sovietism—dressed in multipolar garb: technocratic, surveilled, and centrally managed.
We’re not witnessing the fall of the old world order. We’re witnessing its rebranding.
Yes, Western media lies. But BRICS+ is not the alternative it's marketed to be. It is a globalist-engineered bloc—and in many ways, it’s further along in adapting to the architecture of the coming technocratic system than the West. I spent nearly 13 years living in Asia and saw this convergence firsthand.
Thank you for all you do, Rev Littlefield!
Grace and peace.
—Summer Black
Christian researcher, former senior strategist in syndicated media and global trend forecasting
You may have a point about Brics. I don't see them as good guys. I think they are hard to find among the world leaders at the moment. I hope all globalist efforts fail.
I have a similar take on this topic. I also look at the socio-political issues underpinning Brazil and South Africa which are leaning strongly toward unchecked socialism in the case of the former and rabid ethno-socialism in the latter. Part of the problem in the case of Brazil is that there are long-standing political tensions between them and Argentina which are likely going to become worse with Argentina actually starting to do well for itself under policies which Americans would recognize as closer to classic conservative. As for South Africa, I think they are heading in the same direction of every other third world socialist nation but with the added problem that many other countries in Africa are experiencing - de facto enslavement and deteriorating living conditions at the hands of the Chinese. If it weren't for all the other horrible stuff that China will do in the rest of the world with their increased access to increasingly in-demand rare earth minerals, I'd say we should let Africa fend for itself. Unfortunately, BRICS will become a mechanism of subjugation and manipulation and simple subversion of even the good parts of international law, to wit: China using its coast guard and military to protect its illegal fishing fleets as they poach in protected fisheries in Ecuadorian waters. Eventually, given enough strength, China will either have to come to some kind of fascistic detente with the Muslim world or go to war with it as they have with with Uyghurs.
Even if Israel and the US explicitly stated that they were striking at Iran because of this railway, I wouldn't have a problem with what Israel is doing because, as with everything else, China will use it to circumvent national borders and laws, move ever-increasing amounts of Fentanyl and other contraband, arms trafficking, personnel and materiel for embedded black and gray ops similar to what they have embedded (https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4008817-crack-down-on-illegal-chinese-police-stations-in-the-u-s/) in major cities in the United States. Similarly, it would be a means of moving vast quantities of heroin from Afghanistan and providing arms and technical support to basically every bad actor in the Eastern Hemisphere. Although, unlike in the Koran, there's no explicit endorsement of deception in interpersonal and international dealings, the CCP absolutely cannot be trusted to do anything other than whatever they can so long as it advances their national interests and regardless of international law or the laws of other nations. The only thing this railroad will do is create a link between two sets of powers that are every bit as evil as the Third Reich or the USSR: the Islamic world and the CCP.