Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff C's avatar

Thank you Pastor, for a very thoughtful and well written discussion on this topic. I share your frustration(??) with many of our fellow believers on this topic.

I've attended a Bible-centered evangelical church (Calvary Chapel) for thirty years that while being Dispensationalist, it was not overtly "Israel right or wrong". However, much of the evangelical Christianity faithful really have never had the Dispensational viewpoint seriously challenged, nor do they understand the history behind this interpretation. They genuinely believe the Bible tells us we must always support the modern state of Israel, something that is constantly reinforced in evangelical circles and media. When pressed they throw out verses such as Gen 12:3 and God's promise to Abraham (I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you; And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.) They become defensive when pressed on Israel's atrocities, and fall back into a metaphorical "hey I just work here" posture. In other words, the Bible says I have to support them, it's not up to me.

I myself fell into this reflexive thinking and uncritically defended Israel's actions. They are "God's chosen people" after all, as they have no reticence to tell us. However, two events made me seriously challenge my reflexiveness on this, both having to do with my kids. First was our decision to pull our kids out of public schools and put them in a Bible-based Christian school. For mainly practical reasons we placed them in a conservative Lutheran school (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod). Through this exposure I learned for the first time that Dispensationalism was a minority view in worldwide Christianity, and really only had a stronghold in the US. On top of that, it was non-existent for the first 1800 years of Christianity and only took off with the Scofield Reference Bible being published in 1909. I had no idea the interpretation was so new.

The second item was more selfish, in that I have two teenage boys both of military draft-age. I have zero desire for them to fight (and possibly die) in some foreign Mideast sqalor which would have almost no direct bearing on US national interests. Yet there is this pervading evangelical notion that my unwillingness to sacrifice my sons is somehow defying God (as I'm not willing to "bless Israel"). This lead me to dig more deeply into the entire Dispensationalist interpretation that ended up taking me down a path I never envisioned. I rediscovered some of the passages you note, the writings of Augustine and other heroes of the faith, and for the first time understood the concept of Supersessionism. Our salvation through Christ is available to all, gentile or Jew, by accepting His sacrifice on our behalf. All those who do are now God's chosen people. As simple and as fundamental as this sounds, it was a radical notion for me, and likely is for many Dispensationalists. The idea that Jews get their own separate salvation is pernicious and pervading.

As I dug deeper into it I really began to wonder if the Dispensationalist movement had been hijacked for political reasons by those pushing the establishment and support of the modern Israeli state. There's a very compelling 1988 book, "The Incredible Scofield and His Book" that is now out of print but PDFs can be found online. It's meticulously footnoted, and goes through Scofield's life in painstaking detail. Rev Scofield had a checkered past including legal, financial, and marital troubles of which he never publicly repented. He misrepresented his education by repeatedly referring to himself as a Doctor of Divinity when never having attained a PhD. He had mysterious financial backers for the reference Bible that were never explained. He belonged to an exclusive Manhattan social club (Lotos Club) that would normally not welcome a fundamentalist preacher. There are many other oddities of his life that don't add up. I say this not to slander the dead, but because people who use his footnotes to read their Bible really should understand the character of the man that wrote them.

Last off and most important, I just cannot reconcile Christ's teaching regarding how we are to treat others with the modern Israeli state's actions. Evangelical Christians will study the Gospels in detail and accept without caveat Christ's commands to be kind to others. But then that gets thrown out the window when it comes to the Israeli state because of Gen 12:3 and the subsequent Dispensational interpretation. It's morally flawed and intellectually lazy, yet most evangelical Christians never give it a second thought. "God said it, I do it" is their response. The problem is that God didn't say it, John Darby, Cyrus Scofield and their followers said it. Paul never said it. Augustine, Apollos, John Chrysostom, Aquinas, Luther, or Knox never said it. The historical church never said it.

Ultimately, we will all be judged on this and we better have a good explanation. Telling God that they supported the slaughter of Palestinians because some pastor at a megachurch (a church flying an Israeli flag in outright idolatry) told then to, likely won't be well received. God did give us a brain and reasoning capability for a reason.

Edit: fixed typos

Expand full comment
John Samson's avatar

Among other evils, judeo-churchianity obscures how radically transformative a new Covenant is.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts